the mortal enemy of videogames

I have read precisely two (2) of these books!

I have only read 6 of them lol.

One of them is Deathly Hallows and I’m invoking immunity from having to address that on account of being a person who was born in 1989. I have read it exactly once, which I’m pretty sure was entirely contained within the 24 hours immediately following its release in bookstores.

I’m invoking a similar immunity for having read Life of Pi, which is probably an okay book, but I read it mostly because I was given it as a stocking stuffer, and I guess I read what I had in 2001.

Of the other 4 books, one of them is not Braiding Sweetgrass, but not only could that be a coworker book for me, I could read it at work! I’m almost certain there’s a copy of it in our office. I’m not opposed to it! People in the community have told me it’s a great book. At the same time, I would much rather learn about that kinda stuff with medicine people, in person, you know, according to our oral traditions.

One of the ones on this list I’ve read was also on the other list (critics and fans agree,)

2 Likes

Actually, you know what, fuck it, I’ll say something about Deathly Hallows.

Readers are fuckin wild for this one in the sense that that book is probably the least interesting book in the whole series. It’s a little tiny bit interesting, though, how Rowling chose to conclude the series by taking everything that gave all of the previous books in the series an automatic structure and pacing (the school year, the school, most of the cast of characters), the stuff that I would say was surely the stuff that people latched on to and was probably instrumental to the commercial success of the series, and just fuckin’ binning it tae fuck. Of course, from my memory of it, because she was not a good writer (then or perhaps ever), it ends up just being a messy interlocking chain of Events, and even back then I am pretty sure I felt like the deaths of certain characters was more or less contrived to be shocking and memorable to The Fans, while having little to no dramatic weight or impact on the actual story. Like, come on, what kind of rube is really going to be all that broken up about the heroic sacrifice of the fuckin’ owl that was Harry’s mail carrier? And that’s in, like, what, the first few chapters of the book?

I’ll admit I’m probably applying some degree of selective memory here but I want to sound cooler than I probably was and say that even as I was reading it, I at least vaguely remember feeling that it just didn’t really impact me much at all. I read it in, like, two sittings total from what I remember, and I do remember thinking “well yeah I guess that wraps it up,” but I do also at least vaguely remember feeling at least conflicted. Was that a pivotal moment for me, on the cusp of becoming an adult, developing and exercising an adult’s critical sensibility? Maybe.

At any rate, yeah, readers were fucking off their rockers for that one, I had thought that maybe Readers had had little to no choice but to put Deathly Hallows up on there because it was the only Harry Potter book from the 21st century, but the previous two books were both also from the 21st century. Not even the fuckin’ ‘Snape Killed Dumbledore’ book? It does make me wonder how Readers got their vote split, and perhaps also how the book would change if it wasn’t a 21st Century Books list, but a 21st Century Books List Plus The Four Harry Potter Books From The 20th Century Too Because We Know You Haven’t Read Any Other Books Despite Being A Grown Adult list.

5 Likes

i’ve seen a lot of bar fights start this way

4 Likes

EDIT: Please accept my apologies for the above, I neglected to blur the spoiler that Snape kills Dumbledore

5 Likes

Thankfully I am rarely ever around cishet white women millenials with shitty taste in books so I don’t have to worry about that too much

2 Likes

My constant thought while looking down the list.

In particular, putting Project Hail Mary on the list is just bonkers. That just reeks of people wanting to look “cool” by not just admitting they liked his first book, The Martian the most – because it became super popular and turned in to a film.

I needed weeks of physiotherapy to recover from the strain of rolling my eyes so hard after starting Project Hail Mary and realising it was the most over-done and cliche’d video game plot of all time: first-person protagonist wakes up with amnesia. Get outta here with that garbage.

(not that The Martian deserves to be anywhere near a list of “100 best” either, mind you)

5 Likes

In the alternate timeline in which I went for German Studies instead of Computer Science I would be checking maybe two of these boxes instead of none.

(I put this on my library watch list, thank you)

1 Like

To my surprise, there wasn’t a copy of Braiding Sweetgrass in our office. But, actually, there sort of is:

Interesting!

2 Likes

i finally read this

5 Likes

Nathaniel West’s Miss Lonely Hearts is one of my favorite novellas ever, so it’s with some disappointment that I report that I mostly didn’t like his other most famous novella, The Day of the Locust.

Locust is a satire of Hollywood and the American dream(s), and it does an admirable job at that with some bleak portraits of hopeless weirdos. West’s writing is always crisp and precise and his observations of human conduct thoughtful and clinical. So why didn’t I like it? It’s never bad, but it just also never really gets out of first gear until the scene at the end which is a massive riot outside the premier of a new film. It’s a great scene describing the madness of crowds and the physical and psychic fear of being sucked into the wake of a large mindless group. It’s a cool ending, but kind of too little too late, for me.

Miss Lonely Hearts is an absolute banger, though, so if you haven’t read that give West a chance with that one.

Also recently (re)read The Aeneid (great! Better than I remembered) and The Song of Roland (pretty good! Lots of skull cracking, honor , and xenophobia). Not sure what to read next. Might go to the dark side and read some manga (!) or maybe just more poetry because it’s the best.

4 Likes

Decided I was done just acting like I like Yukio Mishima so I read Temple of the Golden Pavilion. All I have to say about this book is it makes sense Mishima did what he did. It’s interesting how right wing reactionaries get to write openly like that vs how they speak now.

4 Likes

3 Likes

…back when I was a Corporate Strategist by day and crushing Fire Emblem: Three Houses maddening mode by night… NO DLC. NO ONLINE FUNCTIONALITY. Just pure strategic thinking. My mind expanded to places not even seen by Buddha when he sat under that tree (am I remembering that story correctly?) It was February 2020. I was happy. Nothing could derail my life

9 Likes

BotNS readers: I have the Lexicon book lmk if you’d like anything looked up

3 Likes

what happened next

1 Like

“adventure quests” is such an “old man describing video games” phrase. the only adventure quest i know is that old flash game i’d played an unhealthy amount of growing up:
adventure-quest-is-nostalgic-for-many-of-us-v0-b938xltuao7a1.jpg
(not my picture)

6 Likes

good reference for when i one day write the saddleblasters biography

2 Likes

fyi my username was 2good4names, which I stole from someone I’d encountered on Runescape, the other browser-based RPG I wasted too much time on.

(the final game to complete the trinity was, of course, Maplestory.)

Not sure if these contributed to my tactical skills and strategic thinking so much as gave me a heavy tolerance for grinding – or should I say “The Grind”?

5 Likes

I remember Adventure Quest

Why did we tolerate Adventure Quest?

What’s your opinion on the reading order of such a document? I read the appendices for Claw of the Conciliator (“Social Relationships in the Commonwealth”) at the end of the book and almost wish I’d read it first. You get enough contextual information to have a rough idea what exultants, armigers, cacogens, etc. are in a vacuum, but it was illuminating to have it explicitly outlined how they relate to each other and the wider society (something I didn’t think I would be interested in). Is the Lexicon Urthus meant as a companion to the books or something to dig into afterward? At this point—between Claw and Sword—no other terms immediately come to mind.

Not related to BotNS but do you have The Love and Rockets Companion: 30 Years (And Counting)? Is that a resource worth picking up?

it’s not necessary to read it. It attempts to explain some of the metaphysics at play, which I don’t recall having a handle on from the primary text alone. Otherwise it’s just neat information. It’s written by a fan with Wolfe’s input. Part of the urth.net back and forth about the books’ mysterious aspects

yes and it’s not something I think is worth spending too much money or time on. The character encyclopedia and timeline are fun to flip through I guess. The main text is a handful of long interviews with the authors, all but two of which have previously been published elsewhere. The “new” (dating from 2011) interviews are ok I guess. I haven’t cared too much for Sobel’s writing on L&R tbh because it’s more focused on trivia and goes about an inch deep in terms of actual criticism. I thought The Hernandez Brothers: Love, Rockets, and Alternative Comics by Enrique García was better

1 Like